After reading the though provoking article Chronic Illness, Comorbidities, and the Need for Medical Generalism, by Kevin Grumbach, MD, in the first edition of Annals of Family Medicine. I had these thoughts:
The idea of non-reductionist thinking and wholistic planning is so important and so non-western. A reductionist nightmare.
Placing the patient at the center begins to make sense of things. I am not yet sure that we aren't trying to put the PCP at the center; even though that may move in the right direction in some cases.
With the help of Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, we in Whatcom County, WA are building a system to deliver "patient-centered, community-wide, chronic disease management" based upon Wagner's chronic care model. Even that model may be too physician centric. See my post.
Conidering the chaotic non-system and it's misaligned reimbursement, I am not sure that the overburdened PCP can help all the patients navigate. We are using nurse care coordinators Connie Golas and Nancy Stothard to assist, and we also use a patient centered/patient designed Shared Care Plan
I will follow your new journal with interest. As you poit out in the article, we should not be too self congratulatory. For even the best approaches in the US are very inadequate from the patient's perspective. See the Commonwealth Fund report (pdf)
A chasm exists. Any narrow focus on the parts, even the PCP role, risks a further Balkanization of US healthcare. We must focus on the patient and their family, we must include the patient in all the discussions. So long as the journals exclude patients from the dialogue they will miss an opportunity for truly integrative solutions. Even the PCPs may be a "specialists" compared to patients and their families.
My Weblog Comments
