<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- RSS generated by Radio UserLand v8.0.8 on Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:28:07 GMT -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Marcus Pierson, MD: Evidence-based Medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.wwpp.org/users/0000002/categories/evidenceBasedMedicine/</link>
		<description>Effective medicine = patient-centered evidence-based medicine. Yes there is a book by that name.</description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2004 Marcus Pierson, MD</copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:28:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<generator>Radio UserLand v8.0.8</generator>
		<managingEditor>mpierson@peacehealth.org</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>mpierson@peacehealth.org</webMaster>
		<category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category> 
		<skipHours>
			<hour>1</hour>
			<hour>3</hour>
			<hour>2</hour>
			<hour>4</hour>
			<hour>0</hour>
			<hour>5</hour>
			<hour>20</hour>
			<hour>22</hour>
			</skipHours>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title>Screening: Diabetes Mellitus, Adult Type II</title>
			<link>http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm</link>
			<description>&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm&quot;&gt;Screening: Diabe&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm&quot;&gt;http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm&quot;&gt; tes Mellitus, Adult Type II&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;EM&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdiab.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;EM&gt;recommended&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;yesterday &amp;nbsp;that adults with high blood pressure or high cholesterol be screened for type 2 diabetes.&amp;nbsp; It concluded that further research is needed on whether widespread screening of the general adult population would improve health outcomes. The task force also found insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for gestational diabetes in asymptomatic pregnant women.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR&gt;[&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.docnotes.net/&quot;&gt;Family Medicine Notes&lt;/A&gt;]</description>
			<guid>http://www.wwpp.org/users/0000002/categories/evidenceBasedMedicine/2003/03/02.html#a379</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2003 18:20:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<source url="http://www.docnotes.net/rss.xml">Family Medicine Notes</source>
			<comments>http://www.wwpp.org:8080/rcsComments/comments?u=2&amp;amp;p=379&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wwpp.org%2Fusers%2F0000002%2F2003%2F03%2F02.html%23a379</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Problem-Knowledge Couplers</title>
			<link>http://www.pkc.com/</link>
			<description>&lt;P&gt;This is something that a community could support and afford that may not be adopted by many small practices. If the usual adoption delay in health care, 10+ years applies, maybe it is on the horizon.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been watching and wanting this for about 7 years. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://www.wwpp.org/users/0000002/categories/evidenceBasedMedicine/2003/02/15.html#a369</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2003 21:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.wwpp.org:8080/rcsComments/comments?u=2&amp;amp;p=369&amp;amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wwpp.org%2Fusers%2F0000002%2F2003%2F02%2F15.html%23a369</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>A comprehensive book on evidence-based pateint choice.</title>
			<link>http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/band100/b100-7.html#Heading2</link>
			<description>&lt;H4 align=left&gt;Evidence-based patient choice. Editors Adrian Edwards &amp;amp; Glyn Elwyn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001. 330 pp. &amp;#163;19.95. ISBN 0-19-2631942 &lt;/H4&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;If you think this book will tell you how to implement evidence-based patient choice, then don&apos;t buy it. It won&apos;t do that, and, if you thought about it for a moment, you would recognise that it never could. There are too many variables before we even get to how we differ as individuals. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;No, what this book does is to make you think about the issues that might be important to influence patient choice. Having a cast list that includes the usual suspects gives the book power, and the editors seem to have given them a thoughtful pill before they started writing. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;Obviously risk is discussed at some length, and there is a mine of interesting references and perspectives that make one realise that there&apos;s more to this than meets the eye. And what about complex issues like the interaction of health economics and patient choice. It&apos;s covered, and well. But the most gripping chapter is Angela Coulter&apos;s vision of the future, which makes you realise just how much change there is to come. Before the last chapter, evidence-based patient choice could still be an option. After it, there&apos;s simply no argument. &lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;---------------------&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&lt;A href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0192631942/qid%3D1025147607/002-5515417-2040848&quot;&gt;Amazon.com link&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A name=amzn-reviews&gt;&lt;B class=h1&gt;Editorial Reviews&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A name=01926319424400&gt;&lt;SPAN class=small&gt;&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;Book Info&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;SPAN class=serif&gt;Provides a summary of current perspectives, and outlines a model of health care in which the evidence-based approach is integrated with the promotion of consumer choice. Examines the traditional approach, and the changing experience and expectations of consumers. Includes clinical examples and patient narratives. For clinicians and residents. Softcover. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
			<guid>http://www.wwpp.org/users/0000002/categories/evidenceBasedMedicine/2002/06/26.html#a281</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 03:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.wwpp.org:8080/rcsComments/comments?u=2&amp;amp;p=281</comments>
			</item>
		<item>
			<title>Effective medicine means evidence exists.</title>
			<link>http://www.wwpp.org/users/0000002/categories/evidenceBasedMedicine/2002/06/25.html#a270</link>
			<description>Finding ways to increase the use of effective intervention is key to improved care. Just as letting patients make their choice when the evidence does not exist to scientifically support one course of action over another.</description>
			<guid>http://www.wwpp.org/users/0000002/categories/evidenceBasedMedicine/2002/06/25.html#a270</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2002 03:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.wwpp.org:8080/rcsComments/comments?u=2&amp;amp;p=270</comments>
			</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>

